Saturday, May 21, 2005
More thoughts on why a Trusted Logic Voting Process is vital
Following the OASIS EML conference call this week I realized that the work I had been doing on a trusted logic process can be integrated with the existing EML 4.0 XML formats, procedures and requirements. This includes work by the EU Council of Ministers on voting best-practicehere:
http://www.coe.int/T/e/integrated%5Fprojects/democracy/02%5FActivities/02%5Fe%2Dvoting/01%5FRecommendation/
I'm now working on producing that harmonized set of materials injunction with the OASIS EML team - to have a "how to" workbook.
In the process of reviewing these materials I also came across this paper from Douglas Jones at Iowa University:
http://www.cs.uiowa.edu/~jones/voting/nas-cstb2004a.shtml
that is very complimentary to the underlying assertions in the overall "Nutshell" slides on trusted logic voting: http://drrw.net/backup/Trusted-Ballot-Processing-Nutshell.pdf
Enjoy, DW
http://www.coe.int/T/e/integrated%5Fprojects/democracy/02%5FActivities/02%5Fe%2Dvoting/01%5FRecommendation/
I'm now working on producing that harmonized set of materials injunction with the OASIS EML team - to have a "how to" workbook.
In the process of reviewing these materials I also came across this paper from Douglas Jones at Iowa University:
http://www.cs.uiowa.edu/~jones/voting/nas-cstb2004a.shtml
that is very complimentary to the underlying assertions in the overall "Nutshell" slides on trusted logic voting: http://drrw.net/backup/Trusted-Ballot-Processing-Nutshell.pdf
Enjoy, DW
# posted by DRRW @ 3:44 PM 
